top of page

The Numbers May be Right.

3 days ago
1 min read

๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ž๐ฌ๐ง'๐ญ ๐š๐ฅ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ž๐š๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ.


I've spent much of my career looking at data and asking a fairly simple question:


๐˜‹๐˜ฐ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ?


That's also an incredibly useful question during a merger or acquisition.


Traditional due diligence can tell you a great deal about a company. But sometimes the interesting things aren't sitting neatly in a financial statement or contract. They're buried in the underlying data.


A strange concentration of transactions.

Payments that don't follow the normal pattern.

Duplicate or related vendors.

Unusual timing.

Adjustments that consistently move in one direction.

Operational activity that doesn't quite support the financial story.


None of those things, by themselves, prove fraud.


But they can tell you where to look next.


That's where I think forensic data analysis can add another dimension to M&A due diligence: not starting with an accusation, but starting with curiosity.


๐‘พ๐’‰๐’‚๐’• ๐’…๐’๐’†๐’” ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’…๐’‚๐’•๐’‚ ๐’”๐’‚๐’š - ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’…๐’๐’†๐’” ๐’Š๐’• ๐’‚๐’ˆ๐’“๐’†๐’† ๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’‰ ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’”๐’•๐’๐’“๐’š ๐’˜๐’†'๐’“๐’† ๐’ƒ๐’†๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’•๐’๐’๐’…?


That's often where the interesting work begins.




ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments


bottom of page